Vatican money for real estate investments: documents and PCs seized from Monsignor Perlasca
The Vatican gendarmerie triggered a series of searches against Monsignor Alberto Perlasca, former head of the administrative office of the First Section of the Secretariat of State, seizing various material, including paper documents and computer equipment. The Prelate is the sixth suspect in the investigation which last October saw five employees of the Holy See under investigation and suspended.
In Vatican check a sixth investigated in the investigation on financial and real estate investments carried out with the money of the Curia. In the past few hours, in fact, the Vatican gendarmerie has triggered a series of searches against Monsignor Alberto Perlasca, former head of the administrative office of the First Section of the Secretariat of State, seizing various material, including paper documents and computer equipment, present at the office and home of the prelate. As reported by a press release from the Vatican Press Office, the searches and kidnappings, ordered by the Promoter of Justice Gian Piero Milano and the Deputy Alessandro Diddi, “are linked to what emerged from the first interrogations of the officials under investigation and suspended from service at the time”.
The 59-year-old Perlasca, substitute Promoter of Justice at the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura since July 2019, therefore becomes the sixth suspect in the investigation which in October last year had seen five employees of the Holy See investigated and suspended. The allegations against Monsignor Alberto Perlasca emerged precisely from the statements of the five suspects. The investigation was launched after some complaints made following investigations carried out by Vatican financial and control bodies and intends to shed light on some speculative real estate and financial investments also outside Italy and made with the money of the Holy See. The offenses include embezzlement, abuse of authority and corruption.
After the scandal that led to the first suspects, the same Pope francesco had talked about “Suspicious financial situations, that beyond the possible illegality, they are badly reconciled with the nature and purposes of the Church, and which have generated disorientation and disquiet in the community of the faithful ”. “The Promoter’s Office and the Gendarmerie Corps – concludes the note from the Press Office – are continuing with administrative-accounting investigations and cooperation activities with foreign investigative authorities”.
Deepening the Investigation: Context and Consequences
The seizure of materials from Monsignor Perlasca's office and residence marks a critical escalation in a probe that is increasingly seen as a litmus test for the Vatican's commitment to financial transparency. This investigation does not exist in a vacuum; it is the latest and most dramatic chapter in a decade-long struggle to modernize the Holy See's economic structures. To understand its full significance, one must consider the broader landscape of Vatican finance and the persistent challenges it faces.
The Long Road to Financial Reform
For years, international bodies like Moneyval (the Council of Europe’s anti-money laundering committee) have pressured the Vatican to adhere to global financial standards. Under Pope Benedict XVI and accelerated by Pope Francis, significant reforms were instituted, including the creation of the Financial Information Authority (AIF) and later, the Supervisory and Financial Information Authority (ASIF). These bodies were designed to oversee all Vatican financial operations and ensure compliance. The current investigation, notably triggered by internal reports from these very control bodies, demonstrates that these mechanisms are, in theory, functioning. However, the alleged scale of the suspect investments suggests that old networks and opaque practices within certain curial departments have proven resistant to change.
Common Pitfalls in Large-Scale Institutional Investing
While the specifics of the Vatican's case involve unique governance structures, the alleged missteps mirror common mistakes in institutional asset management. Experts in non-profit and institutional finance point to several recurring dangers:
- Lack of Clear Investment Mandates: Without a crystal-clear, written policy defining acceptable asset classes, risk levels, and geographic boundaries, decisions can become arbitrary and vulnerable to personal influence.
- Concentration of Authority: When too few individuals control both the authorization and execution of investments, essential checks and balances fail. The separation of duties is a fundamental principle of financial control.
- Chasing "Exclusive" Opportunities: Investments presented as unique, off-market deals, often involving personal connections, frequently bypass standard due diligence procedures and carry higher risks of overvaluation or fraud.
- Inadequate Documentation: Failing to maintain a transparent "paper trail" that justifies each decision, from initial proposal to final approval, creates an environment where accountability disappears.
A Broader Perspective: The Impact on Trust and Mission
Beyond the legal and financial ramifications, this scandal strikes at the heart of the Church's moral credibility. The Vatican's finances are not those of a corporation; they are sustained by the donations of the faithful worldwide—often from poor communities—and are meant to fund the Church's religious and charitable mission. The alleged diversion of these funds into speculative ventures represents a profound breach of trust. Financial experts advising religious institutions universally stress that investment strategies must be ethically aligned with the organization's mission, not merely seek the highest return. This often means implementing negative screens (avoiding investments in harmful industries) and positive ones (favoring socially responsible projects). The optics of the Church's funds being tied up in high-stakes London real estate or luxury developments, as has been reported in related cases, are damaging regardless of the legal outcome.
The seizure from Monsignor Perlasca, a figure who moved from a key administrative role to a judicial one, underscores the investigation's sensitivity. It suggests prosecutors are piecing together a chain of decision-making across multiple departments. The ultimate test will be whether this judicial process can deliver not only legal accountability but also catalyze a deeper, systemic cultural shift from secrecy to stewardship, ensuring the Church's treasury serves its gospel mission with integrity.
📅 Last updated: 20.12.2025
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
💬 Who is Monsignor Alberto Perlasca?
Monsignor Alberto Perlasca is a former head of the administrative office of the First Section of the Vatican's Secretariat of State. He is currently a substitute Promoter of Justice at the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura and is under investigation in a Vatican financial probe.
💬 What is the Vatican investigation about regarding real estate?
The investigation concerns financial and real estate investments made using Vatican (Curia) money. It involves allegations of misconduct, leading to searches, seizures of documents and computers, and several suspended employees.
💬 What was seized from Monsignor Perlasca in the Vatican raid?
The Vatican gendarmerie seized various materials from Perlasca's office and home, including paper documents and computer equipment. This action was ordered by Vatican prosecutors based on evidence from interrogations of other suspended officials.
This post is also available in:
Español (Spanish)
